|
|
Post by Tallahar on Oct 27, 2008 17:39:41 GMT -5
I don't think Fossoway would be a Moderate House with them losing respect and me taking there Keep.
Also it's House Hunt of Tumbleton.
Plus I think my House would be higher then a lesser one as were cousins to the lords so I would get a lot more stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Imry Willfyre on Oct 27, 2008 17:57:50 GMT -5
I don't think Fossoway would be a Moderate House with them losing respect and me taking there Keep. Also it's House Hunt of Tumbleton. Plus I think my House would be higher then a lesser one as were cousins to the lords so I would get a lot more stuff. There are two branches of the House Fossoway. You took Cider Hall, but New Barrel and the Green branch still remain. |
|
|
|
Post by Tytos on Oct 27, 2008 18:26:31 GMT -5
Even if they are cousins with the Tyrells, that doesn't affect the house size, the amount of lands does. And frankly, the Dawnroses don't have all that much land.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tallahar on Oct 27, 2008 19:45:21 GMT -5
What do you have that to go by.
If the Green Apple Fossoways are another line of Red Apple so there land would be even smaller then the originals.
Also I know that Breck but I mean do you really think people would still respect Green Apple Fossoways because Aaron was a Red one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fel on Oct 27, 2008 20:03:16 GMT -5
Even if they are cousins with the Tyrells, that doesn't affect the house size, the amount of lands does. And frankly, the Dawnroses don't have all that much land. Yea, that's a rather baseless assumption. Tallahar was granted all the lands House Fossoway of the Red Apple. I think both Fossoway houses would probably have been considered moderate houses by this scale. |
|
|
|
Post by Tallahar on Oct 27, 2008 20:09:45 GMT -5
I actually wrote it that it was all of the Red and some of the Green.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tytos on Oct 27, 2008 21:07:54 GMT -5
Ah, I was under the impression that Dawnrose Keep was just a Keep somewhere along the edge of the red mountains. I'll edit it accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tytos on Oct 31, 2008 17:46:23 GMT -5
Okay, I've gotten rid of the second troop type and changed troop costs, as well as added in ships. The calculator at the end is now just for your personal use in calculating the costs of different things, like how much it will cost to raise X amount of troops etc. www.mediafire.com/download.php?mrdewmwunew |
|
|
|
Post by Fel on Nov 2, 2008 21:05:28 GMT -5
Problems with your ship alotments:
House Overton of Bear Island have been given no ships
The Riverlands have ports on the eastern side of the continent, so likely Seagard does not provide the entirety of it's strength at sea.
I'd say the Lannister:Farman ratio is probably more like 80:30
You've given the Major and Moderate houses of the Iron Islands each one more ship hen they are capable of manning given their troop strengh.
King's Landing does not count as part of the Crownlands, and has it's own fleet. Other areas apart from Duskendale that would provide ships in the Crownlands would be Stonedance, Dragonstone, Driftmark and Crab Isle.
I'd always understood that it was House Estermont that provides the majority of the Stormlands naval strength, I might be wrong though. Blackhaven is not by the sea and so Dondarrions wouldn't have ships
The naval power of the Mander would be mre appropriate if it was spread out over all the houses of the Shields instead of given to just one of them.
I think Redwyne would have more ships than Hightower, as the Arbor fleet is the one that is consistently mentioned.
Dorne's ships should probably be spread more evenly around its coastal keeps.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tytos on Nov 2, 2008 21:21:35 GMT -5
*sigh* Yeah okay, I'll get working. I got pretty lazy with the ships...  First off the reason I didn't give ships to other Riverlands/ Crownlands houses is because I said only moderate or higher houses had ships. Although I suppose that really isn't fair. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Nov 2, 2008 22:14:32 GMT -5
Smaller houses have smaller amounts of ships. the ratios should be relatively the same as troops, I imagine, except landlocked castles don't get any ships
|
|
|
|
Post by The Flint on Nov 3, 2008 12:50:41 GMT -5
Why wouldn't King's Landing count as part of the Crownlands?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fel on Nov 3, 2008 14:13:36 GMT -5
Oh, I guess it would be. I remember before that the Crownlands and the Crown had two seperate fleets, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore. In that case, KL would probably control most of the Crownlands fleet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Gaspard Yronwood on Nov 28, 2008 13:50:41 GMT -5
Is this economy talk scrapped or are you guys still working on the details?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erik on Nov 28, 2008 16:15:53 GMT -5
Yeah, I'd like to know exactly how many piles of gold I have.
|
|
Hope you all are well and happy.