|
Post by melon on Oct 14, 2007 2:41:13 GMT -5
Yea probaly but I don't think we heard a lot of their children.
|
|
|
Post by sercoletyrell on Oct 14, 2007 2:42:19 GMT -5
Mayhaps, though they were probably also bastards, I don't think GRRM actually wanted to deal with that little issue now that I think about it.
In any case, I don't think it makes much sense for a son of a bastard to be called "Flowers", at the very least the son would probably create a new name for himself. Otherwise there would be a huge amount of people called flowers, rivers, stone, etc who weren't actually bastards. But no point in going back on his name now.
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 14, 2007 2:45:27 GMT -5
I know, but can they just change their name. In their society I do not think that would be possible. Maybe they take the wife's name?
|
|
|
Post by sercoletyrell on Oct 14, 2007 2:53:46 GMT -5
I always assumed changing your name was a very easy thing to do in Westeros.
Anyway, I checked the Citadel's concordance section of bastards, and it seems you may have been right. The only thing it said about a bastard's child is:
Which would imply that taking the bastard name of their parents/father was the done thing (unless perhaps the child's mother had a proper name, as you suggested). Though I still find the idea pretty silly. The bastard names would become so common as to be meaningless.
|
|
|
Post by melon on Oct 14, 2007 2:56:53 GMT -5
But in ASOIAF we don't get a look into peasant POV its always been Lords where Bastards aren't liked.
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 14, 2007 3:06:59 GMT -5
Do the small folk have last names in Westeros. I can't remember any with a last name right now. Maybe only the highborn bastards get the patronym of their region.
|
|
|
Post by sercoletyrell on Oct 14, 2007 3:10:02 GMT -5
All of Robert's illegitimate children had bastard names, and most of them ended up pretty common (one even working in a whore house, I do believe), but they may have gotten the bastard names because their mothers knew they were the king's children.
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 14, 2007 3:12:08 GMT -5
Probably not though. Otherwise it would have been easy to find robert's bastard children. All the kids with last names line up against this wall, every one else may go home.
|
|
|
Post by sercoletyrell on Oct 14, 2007 3:15:58 GMT -5
Haha yea, I suppose. Though they wouldn't necessarily have to be the king's children, just the bastard of any old highborn, so it wouldn't be so easy .
|
|
|
Post by Horas on Oct 14, 2007 3:22:33 GMT -5
I think the legitimate sons of bastards do change their names on occasion. I recall a guy in AFFC who changed his name from his father's last name (Waters) to Longwaters, in order to show that he himself was not a bastard.
|
|
|
Post by melon on Oct 14, 2007 3:23:57 GMT -5
Well we know that people can do it know but no one is a bastard so yea.
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 14, 2007 3:28:36 GMT -5
Yeah and Oldflowers.... I wonder if half the highborn used to be bastards but the just changed their names. To Karstark or something.
|
|
|
Post by melon on Oct 14, 2007 3:30:37 GMT -5
Well Karstarks were Starks but from a younger brother.
|
|
|
Post by Princess Ariel Targaryen on Oct 14, 2007 3:32:20 GMT -5
To answer your comment, Smith:
What do you call Paris Hilton's limo? Social mobility.
|
|
|
Post by sercoletyrell on Oct 14, 2007 3:32:31 GMT -5
Hehe, well the origins of the Karstarks is well documented in the books and they aren't bastard, but nah, I think bastards becoming lords and creating unique names for themselves are definitely in the minority among the highborn.
|
|