|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 10, 2007 2:26:26 GMT -5
I was planning on doing the Melee as a modification of the archery. Roll every one and people who score to low are eliminated. After the first roll like that I will allow people to guide their character into particular fights or double teams. And here would do individual combat. Then go back to the mass rolls and so on and so on until it is taken care of.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 10, 2007 8:09:13 GMT -5
I think that's the best way. It gets rid of the initial rush of opponents by halfing their number after 1 round and then makes it more manageable.
To help those not online when you roll them do you think it a good idea to have a "Melee plan" thread for those characters who particularly want to go after someone (Keath/Dayne)
Also do you have any thoughts on +/- bonuses for "gang-ups" e.g. Keath or "buddies" e.g. Humphrey, Symond, Tallahar & Vincent
|
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 10, 2007 11:44:00 GMT -5
Do you think plus five or plus ten for every buddy?
I will start a Melee plan thread right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 10, 2007 12:03:06 GMT -5
Well it depends if you mean for the person they're buddying or as a whole.
If it's just for the person being guarded or attacked I think +10 is ok.
If it's for all the attackers/defenders, I'd say +5
e.g. Tallahar is protected by Humphrey, Vincent and Symond. In the first situation only Tallahar gets +10, the rest stay as they are as they are concentrating on defending Tallahar, not themselves. If we go down the second route, they fight like a unit so all receive a smaller bonus +5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 10, 2007 12:08:50 GMT -5
I get it good idea
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 10, 2007 12:11:49 GMT -5
So which are you going for?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 10, 2007 12:15:38 GMT -5
I actually thougt both, if they are protecting someone he gets plus ten, and maybe they get negative five. But if they are all just working as a group they all get plus five.
It would depend on how they frame their orders.
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 10, 2007 12:17:51 GMT -5
Ah yes, I see. Good point about the negative 5 as well by the way.
Of course it's not massive differences either way
|
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 10, 2007 12:23:41 GMT -5
No but small things could change the whole outcome. Also by the way I think it is good for us to know this stuff, but I prefer to no show them the meat factory just give them the sausages.
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 10, 2007 13:52:24 GMT -5
Yeah, no probs.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 11, 2007 3:31:33 GMT -5
If you want to start the Melee I think we have the basic idea done. I am falling asleep though and have to go to bed.
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 11, 2007 8:47:26 GMT -5
Here are my ‘rolls’ for phase 1, so you can see my working out. The figure in brackets is the skill and the last figure is the total inc. roll
Lord Tommen Redfort (Vale) – E (80) - 155
Ser Harry Belmore (Vale) – NW (70) - 170
Ser Haviland Ashby (Duskendale) – NW (70) - 127
Ser Seth Greyjoy – E (80) - 133
Lord Quellon Drumm - "the Beast of Old Wyk" – M (90) - 140
Theon Orkmont - called the "Devilblade" – E (80) - 124
Vincent Serry – NW (70) - 142
Cedric Lannister – E (80) - 147
Werwick Payne
Ser Renald Flowers – NW (70) - 154
Lord Quinn Wydman – L (110) - 201
Ser Elgin Coldwater – NW (80) - 108
Jonas Waxley – E (80) - 124
Dortmund Grafton – NW (70) - 96
Lord Tallahar Tyrell – GM (100) - 140
Ser Erik Tyrell – M (90) - 128
Lord Warren Blackwood – E (80) - 155
Ser Kennos Keath – M (90) - 171
Graham Blackwood – E (80) - 110
Lord Tristane Ryger, called the Unflinching – E (80) - 173
Felwick Gower – E (80) - 96
Lord Barret Tyrell – M (90) - 150
Ser Georth Tyrell – NW (70) - 98
Ser Yorel Serry – M (90) - 116
Cameron Lyberr – NW (70) - 116
Augustan Meadows – NW (70) - 95
Symond the Singer – NW (70) - 77
Mashuda – Beg. (40) - 97
Ser Jonas Westerling – NW (70) - 152
Ser Donal Foote – NW (70) - 111
Ser Jaime Hamell – NW (70) - 104
Lord Robar Hunter (Vale)
Ser Gerold Templeton, the Knight of Ninestars – NW (70) - 139
Clive Lannister
Sylas Wyl – NW (70) - 135
Rodrick Wyl – NW (70) - 90
Benjen Sand – NW (70) - 164
Aethan Stone – NW (70) – 149
Ser Timm Dayne – GM (100) - 155
Ser Giles Grandison – GM (100) - 145
Ser Ronald Tyrell – M (90) - 106
Ser Miles Oldflower – L (110) - 201
Lord Lyas Bolton – E (80) - 160
Lord Butler Manderly – NW (70) - 146
Lord Hunter Flint – NW (70) - 120
Kaleb Flint – NW (70) - 140
Lertner Flint – E (80) - 155
Lord Mendel Ryswell – NW (70) - 95
Lord Savion Dustin – NW (70) - 118
First Ranger Jamie Bracken – L (110) - 155
Ranger Potbelly – NW (70) - 155
Ranger Devan of the Horns – NW (70) - 129
Lord Jon Royce – GM+Bronze Armour (100+10) - 208
Ser Bronn – NW (70) - 164
Ser Roland Royce – E (80) - 147
Hoyle Sunderland – NW (70) - 76
Marten Lannister – E (80) - 141
Ser Quentin Hill – E (80) - 100
“Lionel Keane” (Steffon Baratheon) – NW (70) - 135
Ser Cole Tyrell – App (60) - 84
Lady Alla Hunter – NW (70) - 83
Ser Humfrey Drox – NW (70) - 99
Devan Hersey – NW (70) - 113
Robert Pyle – NW (70) - 98
Captain Erik Pyke – E (80) - 110
Harrin of Orkmont – NW (70) - 86
Walter Crakehall – NW (70) - 158
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 11, 2007 10:12:18 GMT -5
I'm a bit loath to start the second phase bearing in mind Emelia's "secret" instructions to you which she didn't copy me into. Bah! Wish all hers had been knocked out in the first phase  |
|
|
|
Post by The Smith on Oct 11, 2007 11:21:11 GMT -5
And I specifaically asked her last night to send you a copy. SIlly princess
|
|
|
|
Post by theother on Oct 11, 2007 11:24:20 GMT -5
Ah. There was me thinking she was going to be ultra sneaky and deceptive. How boring |
|
