|
Post by melon on Nov 11, 2007 3:03:31 GMT -5
This is just to ask IC and OOC if you are against the Reach reuniting or are you against.
Me: For One Reach Tallahar: For One Reach.
|
|
|
Post by The Flint on Nov 11, 2007 3:04:58 GMT -5
This isn't really a terribly relevant question. I don't think anyone is AGAINST a united Reach. Its more about how and when. If we simply undo what the peace treaty did, the other Lords will call us oathbreakers and crush us again. Than they will split the pieces of the reach up amongst themselves.
|
|
|
Post by melon on Nov 11, 2007 3:07:22 GMT -5
I know that but we got to get some sort of planning going and because it is hard for gossip and stuff like that about who supports it and who doesn't I thought this was an easy to do it.
|
|
|
Post by The Flint on Nov 11, 2007 3:16:07 GMT -5
I think we're really talking at least a generation, and by then someone may be playing Craych and the young hightower, so who knows what will happen.
|
|
|
Post by melon on Nov 11, 2007 3:17:32 GMT -5
Yea I know that but it would be up fill I believe for us now to know.
|
|
|
Post by Ser Kenneth Coyn on Nov 12, 2007 13:06:24 GMT -5
While the Reach may be divided on paper, as long as the leaders remain united there won't be much difference. The Reach was based on a feudal system anyways but now instead of one man calling up their forces there are two, we just need to stay united and continue to coordinate, the problem will be when/if the two regents don't agree.
When the time comes there will probably be a pretty good story for why the reach reunites, my guess is that it would involve fighting each other.
|
|