|
Post by barker520 on Apr 22, 2008 11:42:33 GMT -5
Roose, I was thinking. The Houses in the Stoney Shores (there were 4) were completely obliterated and ended, putting them extinct, during the rebellion there under Wat and Jack. New lords who you trust needs to be awarded these 4 keeps to rule and pass on to their sons, and their sons, and so on.
|
|
|
Post by Percy Rivers on Apr 22, 2008 19:33:37 GMT -5
I've actually been thinking about some possibilites.
1) Award the southron portion of the Stoney Shores to one of the Rill Houses (Tallhart, and Ryswell respectively), and the northern portion to House Glover, this would increase some good will among those lords.
2) Take it directly under House Stark authority and appoint a sheriff/magistrate/mayor over the Stoney Shores
3) Create a new northern House
4) (This option isn't really being taken seriously, it was just a spur of the moment kinda thing) Entice Erik Coldiron to submit to Winterfell's authority rather than Harlaw's by offering him lordship over the Stoney Shore as well.
|
|
|
Post by Ollie on Apr 22, 2008 23:23:26 GMT -5
Or you could always give it to House Reed...
But seriously, I like option 3 and 2, or kinda 1.
|
|
|
Post by barker520 on Apr 23, 2008 9:26:00 GMT -5
I like 1 & 3 Number 1 would gain three quick allies that would be loyal. And number 3 is just cool.
|
|
|
Post by Percy Rivers on Apr 23, 2008 21:49:14 GMT -5
Edmure's such a little bitch.
|
|
|
Post by barker520 on Apr 24, 2008 9:06:01 GMT -5
Hahaha.
|
|
|
Post by Percy Rivers on Apr 24, 2008 22:06:11 GMT -5
Alright, while 3 may be cool, it is not the best one.
So I've narrowed it down to 1 and 2.
Give me your votes people.
|
|
|
Post by Ollie on Apr 24, 2008 23:44:18 GMT -5
2, until a time you find it suitable to place these lands under another's control.
|
|
|
Post by barker520 on Apr 25, 2008 8:42:18 GMT -5
Well, continuing Olander's thoughts, if you do 2, it will eventually need to be changed to policy 1 or 3. So if I can only choose between 1 and 2, I vote for 1.
|
|